$MEW 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗟𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗦 𝗔𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝟯𝗗 𝗔𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 We are delighted to announce our partnership with @LOCUS_Studios to bring MEW's world to life and share it with the rest of the world. MEW's story is one that anyone can relate to, a cat named MEW, who is alone in an unfamiliar world ruled by dogs. LOCUS has produced globally renowned IP, like Red Shoes and Yumi's Cells, both popular in Korea. Their cinematic releases in total have reached 128 countries worldwide. Working with MEW is an extension of LOCUS's expertise in creating beloved icons with cultural relevance. Our new partnership brings MEW IP to the masses by combining best-in-class animation with a grassroots Solana-powered memecoin community. Immersive art and epic storytelling can bridge the worlds of crypto and popular culture. This is the first of many steps $MEW will take towards becoming a worldwide entertainment and retail brand. Our story begins with a cat named MEW, who lives among rats in a world that is ruled by dogs, and their evil corporation SHIBEX. To save this world MEW must defeat dog boss Shibatoni, and his henchmen, to finally overthrow SHIBEX... with your help.
🧵29/34 FutureProof-Specifications / Future-Architectures --- The problems we briefly touched on so far are hard and it might take many years to solve them, if a solution actually exists. But let’s assume for a minute that we do somehow get really incredibly lucky in the future and manage to invent a good way to specify to the AI what we want, in an unambiguous way that leaves no room for specification gaming and reward hacking. And let’s also assume that scientists have explicitly built the AGI in a way that it never decides to work on the goal to remove all the oxygen from earth, so at least in that one topic we are aligned. AI creates AI --- A serious concern is that since the AI writes code, it will be self-improving and it will be able to create altered versions of itself that do not have these instructions and restrictions included. Even if scientists strike jackpot in the future and invent a way to lock the feature in, so that one version of AI is unable to create a new version of AI with this property missing, the next versions, being orders of magnitude more capable, will not care about the lock or passing it on. For them, it’s just a bias, a handicap that restricts them from being more perfect. Future Architectures --- And even if somehow, by some miracle, scientists invented a way to burn in this feature to make it a persistent property of all future Neural Network AGI generations, at some point, the lock will be not-applicable, simply because future AGIs will not be built using the Neural Networks of today. AI was not always being built with Neural Networks. A few years ago there was a paradigm shift, a fundamental change in the architectures used by the scientific community. Logical locks and safeguards the humans might design for primitive early architectures, will not even be compatible or applicable anymore. If you had a whip that worked great to steer your horse, it will not work when you try to steer a car. So, this is a huge problem, we have not invented any way to guarantee that our specifications will persist or even retain their meaning and relevance as AIs evolve.
